Skip to Main Content
Our Commitment to Diversity

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE

David A. Fusco

REPRESENTATIVE ENGAGEMENTS

Represents manufacturer of ethylene oxide sampling equipment in connection with regulatory and related issues.
Serves as lead counsel for an international polymer manufacturer defending a putative class action involving environmental ethylene oxide emissions and thousands of putative class members.
Serves as lead counsel for a mining equipment manufacturer defending product liability claims related to alleged hazardous coal and silica dust exposures.
Serves as national coordinating counsel for engineered stone manufacturer defending product liability claims related to alleged silica exposure.
Serves as a national trial team leader coordinating expert and trial defense strategies for equipment manufacturer with thousands of asbestos claims pending throughout the United States.
Serves as national coordinating counsel for industrial premises owners facing asbestos claims pending in multiple jurisdictions.
Represents global chemical company in the defense of class action claims related to alleged exposures from various toxic substances.
Represents international manufacturer of peat moss products in the defense of product liability claims.
Represents gasoline distributor in benzene product liability litigation.
Represented manufacturer of hydroforming equipment in claims related to alleged deceptive sales practices and defective design.
Represented national financial institution in claims related to alleged violations of the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act.
Pro Bono: Represented indigent client in civil claim involving self-defense related to a physical altercation resulting in significant bodily injury.
Counseled regional financial institution regarding investigation of former outside counsel’s conduct.

REPRESENTATIVE TRIAL EXPERIENCE

Served as trial counsel for equipment manufacturer with alleged asbestos liabilities in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, case dismissed by plaintiff following favorable jury verdict.
Served as trial counsel for equipment manufacturer with alleged asbestos liabilities in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, case dismissed at trial following successful argument of motion to exclude evidence of liability for third-party products.
Obtained defense verdict for equipment manufacturer with alleged asbestos liabilities following three-week trial in Chatham County, Georgia.
Successfully argued motion to exclude evidence of liability for third-party products from being used against equipment manufacturer with alleged asbestos liabilities in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, trial that resulted in defense verdict.
Served as trial counsel for equipment manufacturer with alleged asbestos liabilities in Erie County, New York, case resulting in favorable jury verdict.
Served as trial counsel for equipment manufacturer with alleged asbestos liabilities in Erie County, New York, case dismissed during plaintiff's case in chief.
Successfully argued Daubert motion to exclude causation testimony from plaintiff's medical expert in asbestos case pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Krik v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., No. 10-cv-07435, 2015 WL 5050143 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 25, 2015), aff'd, 870 F.3d 669 (7th Cir. 2017).
Successfully cross examined plaintiff's medical causation expert during Daubert hearing in asbestos case pending in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, which resulted in exclusion of expert's testimony and dismissal at summary judgment. Haskins v. 3M Company, No. 2:15-cv-2123-DCN, 2017 WL 3118017, at *6 n.8 (D.S.C. July 21, 2017).
Return to top of page

Email Disclaimer

We welcome your email, but please understand that if you are not already a client of K&L Gates LLP, we cannot represent you until we confirm that doing so would not create a conflict of interest and is otherwise consistent with the policies of our firm. Accordingly, please do not include any confidential information until we verify that the firm is in a position to represent you and our engagement is confirmed in a letter. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. Thank you for your consideration.

Accept Cancel