Skip to Main Content

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE

Gina Marie

Assess efficacy of key words proposed by trial team
Legal review and analysis of client email and attachments in Relativity database for responsiveness and privilege in preparation for production in response to Serious Fraud Office request
Analysis of document titles and content to establish appropriate date for entry in Master Exhibit List in support of arbitration team (2.3); perform searches and review all proposed exhibits submitted by D. Cox, B. Dillman, J. Hansen and J. Robledo to identify all attachments and locate missing attachments (1.6); research, analyze and identify R. Yammine exhibits for the Non-Exhaustive Statement of Defense and the Exhaustive Statement of Counterclaim according to e-DAT protocols (1.2)
Legal review and analysis of P. Asherman documents in preparation for internal review at the request of K. Parker
Conduct Quality Assurance review of completed assignments to assure practice-group maintains accuracy metrics
Assisted consumer division of financial services multinational bank respond to requests from DOJ pertaining to loan records of service members subject to the SCRA.
Conduct review of redacted documents in response to Plaintiffs’ First Requests for Production for privilege determination, including drafting of privilege claims and subject matter descriptions for privilege log
Draft privilege summaries and produce log of documents marked for withholding by counsel
Targeted search of production to locate a targeted subset of agreement documents likely to be privileged and of special interest to trial counsel.
Attend case update meeting regarding substantive case issues and review protocols for review of documents responsive to HSR Second Request
e-DAT Responsive Review Project: Attend team meeting by M. Dawson and  L. Fennell for additional factual and legal briefing on issues relating to internal investigation project
Legal review and analysis of select custodian documents for responsiveness and privilege in preparation for production in response to grand jury subpoena
At the request of W. Jarboe, pull pages from Sunovion produced documents to use in expert deposition preparation for N. Sampson
Conduct Quality Assurance review of completed assignments
Respond to Public Records Act requests and redact or withhold documents according to the RCW exemptions.
Analyze client documents to identify substantive communications regarding negotiation of deformation and settlement criteria in the SPU MOA to assist in drafting historical timeline in opposition to WSDOT’s summary judgment motion
[TMUS/Shrewsbury] Attend case orientation via audio recording by S. Thompson, P. Curran, M. Vetro, E. Blanchard, J. Halter, and M. Collins for factual and legal briefing on issues relating to Complaint following Zoning Board Appeals’ denial of application
Conduct internet audit to locate Valve public statements regarding Steam Controller, as requested by K. Quackenbush

Conduct high level review and analysis of North Slope Borough documents captured by general privilege search terms for production in litigation

Legal review and analysis of Upstream's production documents to identify key issues for trial team
Conduct complex searching in Ringtail database to assist in creation of case timeline and track modifications during agreement negotiations.
Conduct initial assessment and culling of supplemental production in order to facilitate targeted review of key documents by counsel
Conducted initial review of large-volume production to cost-effectively narrow the scope of documents ultimately reviewed by trial team.
Prepare privilege log for submission to SEC in response to request under FINRA
Return to top of page

Email Disclaimer

We welcome your email, but please understand that if you are not already a client of K&L Gates LLP, we cannot represent you until we confirm that doing so would not create a conflict of interest and is otherwise consistent with the policies of our firm. Accordingly, please do not include any confidential information until we verify that the firm is in a position to represent you and our engagement is confirmed in a letter. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. Thank you for your consideration.

Accept Cancel