Skip to Main Content

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE

Robert B. Mitchell

Representing FPR II, LLC before the Washington Court of Appeals in a tax refund action related to B&O tax classifications. See 16 Wash. App. 2d 706 (2021).
Representing Visio Corp. before the Washington Court of Appeals in a case addressing the classification of activities for B&O tax purposes and the scope of issue preclusion in administrative proceedings. See 108 Wash. App. 566 (2001).
Represent Microsoft in statutory and constitutional challenge to state taxation of foreign earnings. See 2025 WL 1232828 (Oregon Tax Court April 29, 2025).
Representing commodity exchanges in a challenge to the Department of Revenue's apportionment of revenue and assessment of B&O tax.
Representing clients having captive insurance matters before the Washington Office of Insurance Commissioner.
Representing a brokerage firm before the Washington Court of Appeals in a case addressing arbitrator misconduct.
Representing the Washington Department of Retirement Systems in cases before the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Washington Court of Appeals.
Representing the US Chamber of Commerce and other interested parties as amici curiae in state and federal appeals.
Representing Presbytery of Seattle before the Washington Court of Appeals, the Washington Supreme Court, and the US Supreme Court in cases addressing the ecclesiastical deference doctrine and church governance and property issues. See 10 Wash. App. 2d 696, cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1371 (2021).
Representing Freeborn Lutheran Church and Diocese of South, Orthodox Church in America, in disputes with former local church leaders.
Representing newspapers and broadcasters in cases alleging defamation and false-light invasion of privacy.
Representing Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project (DV LEAP) and other organizations before the Washington Court of Appeals as amici curiae in cases addressing the presumptive length of domestic violence protection orders.
Representing American Intellectual Property Law Association before the United States Supreme Court as amicus curiae in support of the petitioners in ABC v. Aereo, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2498 (2014).
Representing municipality in case challenging its impoundment of an illegally parked vehicle occupied by a homeless man. See 198 Wash.2d 136 (2021).
Representing municipality and councilmember in action asserting damages for defamation, related state law claims, and alleged constitutional violations arising from statements labeling plaintiff a notorious slumlord, among other things. See 2019 WL 3021791 (July 10, 2019).
Representing United Farmers of Alberta before the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in case challenging damages awarded for tortious interference and fraudulent transfers.
Representing State Treasurer in case challenging allocation of municipal bonds among would-be purchasers. Dismissal of all claims was affirmed on appeal. See 2018 WL 1709674 (April 9, 2018).
Representing Grocery Manufacturers Association in appeals raising First Amendment and Eighth Amendment challenges to penalties imposed under the Fair Campaign Practices Act. See 198 Wash.2d 888 (2022).
Representing an aerospace corporation before the United States Supreme Court in opposing certiorari to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Representing a health insurer before the Washington Court of Appeals in case challenging administrative decision on proposed corporate reorganization and creation of charitable foundations. See 133 Wash. App. 23, 131 P.3d 930 (2006).
Representing employer in appeal of judgment recovered by former executive for breach of contract.
Representing municipalities in litigation challenging regulations of adult cabarets. See 132 Wash.2d 103 (1997); 96 Wash. App. 255 (1999).
Representing survivor in pro bono appeal from the denial of a sexual assault protection order. See 197 Wash. App. 441 (2017).
Representing life insurer in case challenging interpretation of suicide clause and its application to a backdated policy. See 2019 WL 5698789 (Nov. 4, 2019).
Return to top of page

Email Disclaimer

We welcome your email, but please understand that if you are not already a client of K&L Gates LLP, we cannot represent you until we confirm that doing so would not create a conflict of interest and is otherwise consistent with the policies of our firm. Accordingly, please do not include any confidential information until we verify that the firm is in a position to represent you and our engagement is confirmed in a letter. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. Thank you for your consideration.

Accept Cancel