Skip to Main Content
Our Commitment to Diversity

REPRESENTATIVE EXPERIENCE

Michael Thornell

Acting for a multinational professional services partnership in defence and confidential commercial settlement of claim over Coca-Cola Amatil's AU$40 million sale of SPC.
Acting for a law firm in defence of claim by the liquidators of Gallop Investment against its former advisors, arising from the collapse of Gallop's financial planning business and associated investor claims. The liquidator claimed damages in excess of AU$35 million. Confidential commercial settlement was ultimately achieved.
Acting for an insurer in proceedings in the Supreme Court, concerning claims for breach of fiduciary duty and negligence advanced against a solicitor arising from a number of high-value commercial and property transactions. The claims against the insurer were dismissed. CLGC Pty Limited v Zhang [2021] NSWSC 946.
Acting for a law firm in proceedings in the Supreme Court, in which the firm successfully obtained orders pursuant to the Vexatious Proceedings Act against Salim Mehajer, in relation to claims advanced regarding the purported collapse of his property development businesses. Mehajer v SC Lowy Primary Investments Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 689.
Acting for large professional services firms, directors, officers, financial institutions, and auditors in respect to a variety of notices and investigations issued by regulators and government agencies, including negotiating the scope of production; attending on issues of privilege, confidentiality, and secrecy legislation; managing large-scale review and electronic production; preparing submissions; attending on compulsory examinations; and negotiating the cessation of such investigations.
Acting for an officer of a large superannuation fund in response to an investigation commenced by APRA regarding expenditure and governance matters, as well as persistent underperformance.
Acted for insurers joined directly to proceedings in substitution for their missing or deregistered insureds. Penrith City Council v Healey; GIO General Ltd v Healey [2016] NSWCA 161; Cunningham v Guardian Royal Financial Services Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1057.
Acted for insurers in defence of proceedings brought by their insured (a large financial advisor), seeking indemnity for hundreds of claims made against the insured by its clients in the wake of the GFC, totalling in excess of AU$70 million. Confidential commercial settlement was ultimately achieved.
Acted as coverage counsel for insurers of one of the big four banks in relation to civil penalty proceedings brought against the bank by Austrac, arising from the bank's alleged breaches of anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism finance legislation.
Acted for a funds manager in proceedings alleging breaches of fiduciary duty and knowing assistance on the part of a host of parties, which conduct is said to have resulted in the collapse of a property development business valued in excess of AU$100 million.
Acting for a church property trust in relation to claim against QBE, seeking indemnity under policies responding to historical sexual abuse claims. Confidential commercial settlement was ultimately achieved.
Acted for insurers of a publicly listed property valuation and consultancy firm in relation to a business interruption claim arising from a cyber-attack and resultant data breach.
Acted for insurers of a large food and beverage delivery company in relation to a business interruption claim arising from a ransomware attack.
Acted for insurers of an international pharmaceutical company in relation to losses caused by a social engineering attack.
Acted for a hydraulic engineer in defence in a multiparty, multimillion-dollar building and construction dispute brought in the Supreme Court.
Return to top of page

Email Disclaimer

We welcome your email, but please understand that if you are not already a client of K&L Gates LLP, we cannot represent you until we confirm that doing so would not create a conflict of interest and is otherwise consistent with the policies of our firm. Accordingly, please do not include any confidential information until we verify that the firm is in a position to represent you and our engagement is confirmed in a letter. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. Thank you for your consideration.

Accept Cancel