Skip to Main Content
Our Commitment to Diversity

How the Fair Work Commission Assesses your Agreements (and why it's so complex)

Date: 10 October 2017
Australia Labour, Employment and Workplace Safety Alert
By: Elizabeth Ferrier

In a decision handed down last week, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) has given (perhaps unintended) insight into the ever more complex process of getting an Enterprise Agreement approved.

Enterprise Agreements will continue to be a hot button issue both politically and industrially, with employer groups and unions both strongly criticising the current system of enterprise bargaining from different sides of the fence.

In a recent article, we drew attention to the 'line by line' scrutiny the FWC is giving Enterprise Agreements, and the impact that is having on the approval process. Click here to view the article.

The FWC Publishes Its Internal Checklist

The BJS Labour Hire Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement was approved last week by Deputy President Masson with a number of undertakings. The decision is interesting not because of what Deputy President Masson said about the Agreement but because of what was initially published with it - a completed internal FWC document called the 'Single Enterprise Agreement Legislative Checklist" (Checklist). This has since been removed from the Fair Work Commission Website.  Click here to view the checklist. As can be seen, it is lengthy and exhaustive and covers, process, the National Employment Standards and the Better Off Overall Test.

The exhaustive checklist demonstrates an effort by the FWC to address concerns raised in the past that it was approving Enterprise Agreements (both union supported and non-union) that did not meet the requirements of the National Employment Standards and the Better off Overall Test.

What Should Employers do?

Once bargaining is completed and an Enterprise Agreement voted up by employees, all employers (and employees) want to do is get the agreement approved by the Commission and implemented. Using the insight gained from this case, employers should:

  • carefully review their Enterprise Agreements to ensure that they are consistent with the National Employment Standards
  • apply the terms of the Enterprise Agreement to different rostering scenarios to ensure that employees working all roster patterns will be better off overall under the Enterprise Agreement compared to the relevant Award
  • be ready with undertakings for the FWC should they be required.

Critically, employers should also ensure that the application for approval and statutory declarations that accompany applications to the FWC are comprehensive and so far as is possible mirror the approach taken by the FWC, as demonstrated in the checklist. Whilst this may seem a laborious task, it will help the employer pre-empt any issue raised by the FWC (and proactively develop a solution) as well as facilitate a smoother and faster path through the approval process.

This publication/newsletter is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the law firm's clients.

Return to top of page

Email Disclaimer

We welcome your email, but please understand that if you are not already a client of K&L Gates LLP, we cannot represent you until we confirm that doing so would not create a conflict of interest and is otherwise consistent with the policies of our firm. Accordingly, please do not include any confidential information until we verify that the firm is in a position to represent you and our engagement is confirmed in a letter. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. Thank you for your consideration.

Accept Cancel