Skip to Main Content

Reporting Entities Beware: AUSTRAC is Becoming More Active and Getting More Powers

Date: 27 October 2017
By: Jim Bulling, Daniel Knight, Michelle Chasser

There are good reasons to suspect that we may soon see increased enforcement action from the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regulator, Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC).

Historically, AUSTRAC has not been particularly active in exercising its existing enforcement powers. The 2015 review of Australia's AML/CTF effectiveness by the inter-governmental policy making body Financial Action Task Force (FATF) found that AUSTRAC had not taken sufficient enforcement action to ensure compliance by industry. The majority of compliance issues identified by AUSTRAC were voluntarily remediated by reporting entities based on recommendations issued by AUSTRAC. However, recent events, including the record AUD45 million civil penalty awarded against a gaming entity earlier this year together, with the civil penalty proceedings initiated in relation to allegations of non-compliance with AML/CTF law in the banking industry, show that AUSTRAC appears to be getting more active exercising its powers.

In addition to the increased enforcement activity, new enforcement powers currently being considered by Parliament, if passed, will give AUSTRAC the power to issue infringement notices for a greater range of regulatory offences. These powers will include the power to issue remedial directions to a reporting entity to retrospectively comply with an obligation that has been breached. Currently, AUSTRAC only has the power to issue directions requiring reporting entities to take specified action to ensure that AML/CTF laws are not contravened in the future.

Accordingly, with an increasingly active regulator which may soon have enhanced powers, it is important for providers of designated services under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF Act) to ensure that not only your AML/CTF program is compliant, but that it is also implemented and forms part of your day-to-day compliance framework. In circumstances where many organisations are receiving cash transfers via a host of innovative digital payments methodologies, areas of your AML/CTF program to be watchful of are:

  • customer due diligence
  • ongoing customer due diligence
  • politically exposed persons
  • suspicious matter reports
  • threshold transaction reports.

Existing AML/CTF law requires reporting entities to undertake regular independent reviews of their AML/CTF programs. If you haven't undertaken an independent review recently, now is a good time to do so.

Please contact us if you need assistance with an independent review or compliance with your obligations under the AML/CTF Act.

This publication/newsletter is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the law firm's clients.

Return to top of page

Email Disclaimer

We welcome your email, but please understand that if you are not already a client of K&L Gates LLP, we cannot represent you until we confirm that doing so would not create a conflict of interest and is otherwise consistent with the policies of our firm. Accordingly, please do not include any confidential information until we verify that the firm is in a position to represent you and our engagement is confirmed in a letter. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. Thank you for your consideration.

Accept Cancel