Series
Commercial Implications of Tariffs, Trade Policy, and Changes in Law
The Trump Administration has embarked on an ambitious agenda that is reshaping global trade and many domestic policies. Existing contracts may be impacted, particularly where the cost of performance has increased or become more difficult due to tariffs, supply chain disruptions, material or equipment shortages, or changes that impact a project’s funding or financing. Companies are exploring their contractual rights, as many face substantially different circumstances today than when their contracts were signed. Force majeure, change in law, and material adverse change clauses are among the principal clauses that may be applicable to these issues. Each situation presents its own unique set of facts, which must be considered in the context of the contract language and governing law. We are dedicated to keeping our clients informed about commercial issues flowing from executive actions. Visit this page frequently for timely insights and subscribe to our mailing list to receive updates direct to your inbox.
Thought Leadership
On 7 January 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order (EO) aimed at limiting and preventing certain large defense contractors from conducting stock buybacks, issuing dividends, and awarding executive compensation.
In this article, Dr. Jan Boeing and Arnaud Dobelle outline the key milestones of the new regulatory framework, its interplay with financial sector rules such as DORA and PSD2, and what the upcoming Digital Omnibus proposal means for organisations deploying AI in Europe.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act makes major changes to the Internal Revenue Code’s clean energy tax provisions, particularly to the provisions that were extended, expanded, and established as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
On 18 December 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a long-awaited order finding that PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.’s (PJM) tariff is unjust and unreasonable as it relates to co-located load arrangements and directing PJM to establish clear, nondiscriminatory rules supporting co-location of large electricity consumers—such as data centers—and generation facilities.