Series
Responding to COVID-19
The impacts of the 2019 novel coronavirus have quickly spread to affect most industries around the world. While the concern for the health and well-being of individuals is of the utmost priority, our lawyers are closely monitoring the legal implications the outbreak has on your business.
As the world monitors this global health emergency, and begins planning to slowly reopen, we have turned our focus to providing insight and guidance on the topics needed to return to the next normal. Our lawyers are working collaboratively across the globe to help our clients navigate the legal and operational issues arising from the coronavirus pandemic.
Provided below you will find our thought leadership, and timely resources on the subject. If you are looking for something in particular, you can use the filter options below to locate content by topic, region, or type. We also offer a keyword search option to help you find the information you need.
The legal landscape surrounding the effect of the virus is rapidly changing; visit this page regularly for new and updated information or SUBSCRIBE to our All Things COVID-19 email list to receive the latest updates.
Thought Leadership
In the October edition of The Essentials, we summarize key provisions of California employment laws that took effect in 2024 and those that will take effect in 2025.
On 22 December 2020, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments (the final rule) to Rule 206(4)-1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the Advisers Act) to modernize the regulation of investment adviser advertising and solicitation practices.
While most of the attention surrounding the Supreme Court’s (the Court) decision in Loper Bright v. Raimondo (Loper), overturning the longstanding Chevron doctrine, has focused on the increased potential for successful challenges against agency actions, the decision will impact all stages of the public policy lifecycle—legislation, regulation, and only then litigation.
In a landmark ruling with far-reaching consequences for federal agencies and the regulated community, the Supreme Court overturned the 40-year-old Chevron doctrine.