Skip to Main Content
Our Commitment to Diversity
Date: November 2021
K&L Gates Publication

To view Arbitration World in special e-Magazine format, click here.

FROM THE EDITORS

In this edition of Arbitration World, we include our usual update on developments in international arbitration, including reports on recent cases and changes in arbitration laws from regions around the globe, as well as reporting on developments with respect to arbitration institutions.

We include our usual investor-state arbitration update, including discussion of anticipated investor-state disputes arising from government measures taken to fight the COVID-19 pandemic; the process of amendment of the ICSID Arbitration Rules; and an update on the work of the Investment Support Programme for Least Developed Countries, an initiative of the International Development Law Organization; plus our usual review of significant recent cases.

We also include a compendium of articles previously published as Arbitration World alerts. In particular:

We include our article, and link to the associated podcast, on fact witness evidence in international arbitration and the issues raised by the ICC Task Force report on this topic, amid the concerns over the reliability of human memory and thoughts on ways to improve the taking of fact witness evidence. We also include an article considering common criticisms of expert evidence in international arbitration and exploring possible ways of improving the taking of expert evidence. We report on two significant developments related to Swiss arbitration: the formation of the Swiss Arbitration Centre (successor to the Swiss Chambers’ Arbitration Institution) and the release of a new version of the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration. We report on a recent case from the Dubai Court of Cassation finding that the interests of justice can override an agreement to arbitrate in circumstances where a dependent contract does not also provide for arbitration. We also include a review of a decision from the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation confirming that representatives acting under a power of attorney must have express and unambiguous authority to bind a principal to arbitration. 

We report on the release of the new rules of the Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (ACICA), Australia’s premier international dispute resolution institution.

We review the recent Privy Council decision in Betamax Ltd v State Trading Corp. (on appeal from the Supreme Court of Mauritius) regarding what “contrary to public policy” may mean in the context of the recognition and enforcement of international arbitration awards. We review a decision from the English Commercial Court considering the implications of commencing an arbitration without satisfying a contractual dispute resolution “escalation” procedure and whether the subsequent arbitration award may be open to challenge.

Finally, we highlight some aspects of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), covering 15 economies in the Asia Pacific region, of potential relevance from the perspective of foreign investors considering investment in the RCEP member states with respect to investor-state dispute settlement.

We hope you find this edition of Arbitration World of interest and we welcome any feedback (email Ian Meredith or Peter Morton)

IN THIS ISSUE:

Arbitration News from Around the World

by Henry Kim (Singapore), Jon Blaney (Dubai), and Matthew Weldon (New York)

To view this article, click here.

World Investment Treaty Arbitration Update

by Robert L. Houston (Singapore)

To view this article, click here.

Fact Witness Evidence in International Arbitration: Is Change on the Horizon?

by Ian Meredith and Chrissie L. Fox (London)

To view this article, click here.

Swiss Arbitration Revamped - New Arbitration Centre and Amended Swiss Rules

by Dr. Johann von Pachelbel (Frankfurt)

To view this article, click here.

Dubai Court of Cassation Finds that the Interests of Justice Can Override an Agreement to Arbitrate in Circumstances Where a Dependent Contract Does Not Also Provide for Arbitration

by Jennifer Paterson and Mohammad Rwashdeh (Dubai)

To view this article, click here.

Expert Evidence in International Arbitration: Common Criticisms and Innovative Solutions

by Ian Meredith and Louise Bond (London)

To view this article, click here.

International Arbitration in Australia: ACICA Releases 2021 Edition of Arbitration Rules

by John Kelly and Angus Groves (Melbourne)

To view this article, click here.

Privy Council Adopts a Restrictive Approach to Public Policy in International Arbitration - Betamax Ltd v State Trading Corporation (Mauritius)

by Ben Holland (London)

To view this article, click here.

Evaluating Foreign Investment in RCEP Member States From a Dispute Resolution Perspective

by Raja Bose and Robert L. Houston (Singapore)

To view this article, click here.

English Court Dismisses Jurisdiction Challenge to ICC Arbitration Award for Alleged Failure to Comply With an “Escalation” Clause, Ruling It an Admissibility Issue

by Peter R. Morton and Edward A. Brown-Humes (London)

To view this article, click here.

The Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation Confirms That Representatives Acting Under a Power of Attorney Must Have Express and Unambiguous Authority to Bind a Principal to Arbitration

by Jennifer Paterson, Mohammad Rwashdeh, and Sholto Hanvey (Dubai)

To view this article, click here.

Raja Bose
Raja Bose
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC
Singapore
View

This publication/newsletter is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey legal advice. The information herein should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular facts or circumstances without first consulting a lawyer. Any views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the law firm's clients.

Return to top of page

Email Disclaimer

We welcome your email, but please understand that if you are not already a client of K&L Gates LLP, we cannot represent you until we confirm that doing so would not create a conflict of interest and is otherwise consistent with the policies of our firm. Accordingly, please do not include any confidential information until we verify that the firm is in a position to represent you and our engagement is confirmed in a letter. Prior to that time, there is no assurance that information you send us will be maintained as confidential. Thank you for your consideration.

Accept Cancel